Mergers
and Acquisition (Takeover)
Is
It an opportunity for a business to make an investment internationally?
Combining of the two
businesses entities under common ownership is called merger. Expanding the
activities of the firm through acquisition involves significant uncertainties. Very
often the acquiring management seriously underestimate the complexion involved
in merger and post-merger integration.
The benefits from mergers
are often difficult to quantify. The motivation may be to apply superior
managerial skills or to obtain unique technical capabilities or to enter a new
market. Acquiring companies often do not
know what they are buying. If a firm expands by building a factory here or
buying machinery there it knows what it is getting for its money.
By bringing together two
firms at different stages of the production chain an acquirer may achieve more
efficient co-ordination of the different levels. The focus here is on the costs
of communication, the costs of bargaining, the costs of monitoring contracts
compliances and the costs of the contract enforcement. In 2011 Google paid
$12.5bn to buy Motorola mobility, thus linkage a software company with a
hardware manufacturer.
This is a merger that occurs when a larger company
buys a competitor and absorbs it into the greater organization. Shareholders
have the power to vote to approve or deny such a merger. If the shareholders
vote down the acquisition, the corporation cannot legally continue steps to
fulfill the merger. To sway shareholders, corporate officers often disseminate
information relating to the proposed merger, including how the acquisition will
strengthen the corporation and provide a greater share of the profits for
investors.
One the
biggest mergers in recent years are the mergers of British Airlines and Iberia
Airlines (December 2010). The
company will have its headquarters in London, with BA shareholders retaining
55% ownership of the company. The merger is seen as a chance for the two
airlines to cut costs following two very tough years for the airline industry.
Both BA and Iberia are expected to report heavy losses this year, with BA
predicted to announce its biggest annual loss since privatisation.
The
problem can arise when one company have more than 51% of the shares because
they might want to appoint their people on the top jobs. This actually happened
in the case of British Airways and Iberia Airlines. Because according to the
Spanish they want to cancel this merger. Strike action is being threatened by
workers at Iberia in protest against restructuring which will lead to 4,500 job
losses. “It’s not fair and it’s not the way things were supposed to be. The
merger was supposed to bring growth for both companies and benefits for workers
of both airlines,” Sepla head Justo Peral told the Daily Telegraph.
The
Spanish carrier’s chief executive Rafael Sánchez-Lozano said: “Iberia is in a
fight for survival. It is unprofitable in all markets. Unless we take radical
action to introduce permanent structural change, the future for the airline is
bleak.”
There
are fewer risks; economic risk, political and fear of the recession create a
certain type of respond in investing in the company. But in the time of the
recession there is a decline in the market confidence, companies focus on their
core business and they look at the profitability rather than expanding the
business. Because if we compare with the situation of hot kettle as when it is
hot it is hard to touch so when the situation is like this than the companies
think how to make money and this is the period where good companies will
survive and they can create value for the shareholders, and poor companies who
do bad purchases they collapses. Recently sports direct bought Republic. It’s a
bargain due to low share prices which also supports the M&A (merger and
Acquisition).
No comments:
Post a Comment